Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you can People Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out-of connection in the individual mating. Summary of General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Sites paradox revisited. Diary out of Personal Factors, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites contradiction: A social technology you to definitely decreases personal engagement and you can emotional really-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Count, time, and you will duration of marriage ceremonies and you will divorces. Latest Population Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study off intimacy, passion, and you can relationship: Evaluation the brand new assumptions of your own triangular principle out-of love. Psychological Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Perception better on creating bad: Public contrasting within romantic relationships. Record regarding Character and you will Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The newest implicit knowledge out-of intimate competition. Journal out-of Character and you may Social Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and you may relationship fix components
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you’re able to glamorous choices: The brand new advanced mindset away from dating repairs. Progression and you may Peoples Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data regarding conflict and you will agreement inside the distressed and nondistressed marital couples. Log of Contacting and Systematic Mindset, gorgeousbrides.net hop over til webstedet 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Environmentally friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Dating development on line: What’s the large destination? Diary regarding Social Items, 58(1), 9–30.
The advantages of confident illusions: Idealization and build of pleasure inside the intimate relationship
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-investigations aim during the intimate matchmaking: A type of internationally enhancement and you can certain verification. When you look at the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents throughout the study of couples telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge University Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-specialist thread from the contact lens out of connection theory. Psychotherapy: Principle, Look, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New personal monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity so you can societal signs because the an adaptive reaction to personal different. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new societal outcast: Ostracism, societal different, rejection, and you will bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Therapy Push.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Internationally and you can specific relational designs regarding connection with public connections. Journal off Character and Public Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Attachment and guidance seeking inside romantic relationship. Identity and Societal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular attachment representations in the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Diary Away from Personal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal personal relationship: Restoration and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection privately impact certainly one of spouses because a function of brand new resemblance in their common experience. Personality And you will Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience from extrinsic perks to your liking and you will loving. Journal from Personality and you may Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.